Contract may be unenforceable if the parties have not genuinely assented to its terms by:
Bilateral (Mutual) Mistakes can be rescinded by either party.
Unilateral Mistakes cannot be canceled unless: If other party to the contract knows or should have known that a mistake of fact was made. If mistake was due to mathematical mistake in addition, summation, subtraction, division, or multiplication and was made inadvertently and without gross negligence.
Exception: Mistake of value because of a mistake of material fact.
Elements:
Case 13.2:Sarvis v. Vermont State Colleges (2001).
Depends on the knowledge and experience of the party relying
Case 13.3: Folet v. Parlier (2002).
Negligent Misrepresentation.
Confidential or Fiduciary Relationship.
Relationship of dependence.
Influence or Persuasion.
Weak party talked into doing something not beneficial to him or herself.
Presumption of Undue Influence.
Threatened act must be wrongful or illegal.
Improper Threat
Preprinted contract in which the adhering party has no opportunity to negotiate the terms of the contract.
Unconscionability.
One sided bargains in which one party has substantially superior bargaining power and can dictate the terms of the contract.
- Mistake.
- Misrepresentation.
- Undue Influence.
- Duress.
Mistakes of Fact
Only a Mistake of Fact allows a contract to be canceled.Bilateral (Mutual) Mistakes can be rescinded by either party.
Unilateral Mistakes cannot be canceled unless: If other party to the contract knows or should have known that a mistake of fact was made. If mistake was due to mathematical mistake in addition, summation, subtraction, division, or multiplication and was made inadvertently and without gross negligence.
Mistakes of Value
Generally, contract is enforceable by either party.Exception: Mistake of value because of a mistake of material fact.
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Contract Voidable by Innocent Party.Elements:
- Misrepresentation of Material Fact.
- Intent to Deceive.
- Reliance on Misrepresentation.
- Injury to the Innocent Party.
Misrepresentation Has Occurred
Misrepresentation can be express or implied.- Concealment.
- Misrepresentation of future facts and statements of opinion are not fraud, unless person professes to be an expert.
- Misrepresentation of Law is not fraud, unless person has greater knowledge of the law.
- Silence is not fraud, unless serious problem or defect known or asked and person lied.
- Case 13.1: Vokes v. Arthur Murray Inc. (1968).
Intent to Deceive
Scienter is an Intent to Deceive.- Party knowledge that fact is not as stated.
- Party makes a reckless statement with disregard of the truth.
- Party implies that statement is based on personal knowledge or investigation.
Case 13.2:Sarvis v. Vermont State Colleges (2001).
Reliance on Misrepresentation
Deceived party must have Justifiable Reliance.Depends on the knowledge and experience of the party relying
Case 13.3: Folet v. Parlier (2002).
Injury to the Innocent Party
No proof of injury is required when the action is to rescind contract. Proof of injury is universally required to recover damages.Nonfraudulent Misrepresentation
Innocent Misrepresentation.Negligent Misrepresentation.
- Equal to Scienter.
- Is treated as fraudulent misrepresentation, even though the misrepresentation was not purposeful.
Undue Influence
Contract is Voidable.Duress
Forcing a party to enter into a contract under fear or threat makes the contract voidable.Threatened act must be wrongful or illegal.
Improper Threat
- Threat to exercise legal rights (criminal or civil suit).
- Economic or physical.
Adhesion contracts and Unconscionability
Adhesion Contracts.Preprinted contract in which the adhering party has no opportunity to negotiate the terms of the contract.
Unconscionability.
One sided bargains in which one party has substantially superior bargaining power and can dictate the terms of the contract.
- “Standard-form.”
- “Take-it-or-leave-it” adhesion contracts
0 comments:
Post a Comment